[Discuss] Banning characters

[Tom Vogt]

Am 09.06.2008 um 12:33 schrieb struik at t-online.de:

> This time as text mail :-( forgot to remove HTML mail tag of the  
> webmail
>
> Tom Vogt wrote:
>> Ban her for wearing inappropriate socks to your dinner party,if you
>> want. You can be as arbitrary as you like, as long as the otherPLAYER
>> knows that the reason isn't his inactivity. What you do to his
>> CHARACTER I don't care about, the Inalienable Rights are thereto
>> protect players, not characters.
>
> Bah, tom this is a really crap statement from you.
> You normally do not open the door so wide for the word weasels.
> Basically you stated, ban them for inactivity, but make sure youname  
> it
> differently.


No, you didn't read it all. I said make sure the reason isn't  
inactivity. I said in another mail that it's NOT about coming up with  
a good cover story.




-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss