[Discuss] Banning characters

[struik at t-online.de]

This time as text mail :-( forgot to remove HTML mail tag of the webmail

Tom Vogt wrote:
>Ban her for wearing inappropriate socks to your dinner party,if you  
>want. You can be as arbitrary as you like, as long as the otherPLAYER  
>knows that the reason isn't his inactivity. What you do to his 
>CHARACTER I don't care about, the Inalienable Rights are thereto  
>protect players, not characters.

Bah, tom this is a really crap statement from you.
You normally do not open the door so wide for the word weasels.
Basically you stated, ban them for inactivity, but make sure youname it
differently.

You state you protect the players, not the characters. But if thechar
get banned from the realm because of results of his inactivityas the
word weasels will find enough reasons there, than basicallychar and
player melt together and some "valid" reason will befound.

With this statement you do not protect the players inactivity,
youencourage that players characters get banned for inactivity, justthat
it is named differently.





-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss