[Discuss] Banning Characters

[Tom Vogt]

Am 06.06.2008 um 16:01 schrieb John P. Murphy:

>> So, just to clarify:
>>
>> The reason for the ban has to be something legitimately IC like:
>> "You rejected the Crown's authority & insulted the Royal Arbitrator.
>> You poorly managed your city & Duchy. You were given many chances to
>> change, but did nothing. You were asked to step by the Queen, but did
>> not. Now you must be forcibly evicted."
>>
>> ...which should be acceptable even if the player in question
>> *believes* he is being banned for inactivity?
>
> I think that precisely the reverse is true: The important part is
> making sure that the player knows that it's not because of his
> inactivity.  You don't want him thinking, "Aw man, if only I'd had
> less of a social life and logged into BattleMaster more, my character
> would still be a Duchess."


Exactly.

It's not a contest on who can come up with the best cover story.



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss