[Discuss] Banning Characters

[Lyle Esau]

Timothy Collett wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Stijn Van Hove <stijnvanhove at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>   
>>
>> Because punishing someone for lack of activity = breaking  
>> inalienable rights, if I'm not mistaken, it's been a long time since  
>> I've read them.
>>     
>
> That is absolutely true. However, at least in Pian en Luries, his  
> character was not banned for inactivity.
>
> Timothy Collett
>   
No Tim you are correct, but reading the ban it works out to.

You didn't roleplay your apology fast enough, you were asked to step 
down but didn't do it fast enought, you were told to do lots of other 
things but weren't fast enough. So we are banning you so we can have 
someone else be Duchess because the ruler told me to.

I'd read the correctly but I'm in prison now and family page doesn't 
save the whole message. It's so nice how people can word, you are 
inactive, frag off.


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss