[Discuss] Updating Standing Orders as Second in Command of Army

[fodder]

psymann wrote:

> They're not really 'standing' orders if they're dated for only one 
> moment in time, are they?  I thought the point of standing orders was 
> that they were orders that were contnuous until such time as they're 
> changed.  Therefore dating them makes no sense, and I agree that the 
> second-in-command should be able to change (or at the bare minimum, 
> remove) them.
> 
> psymann

well.. whether it makes sense or not, that's the best thing you can do 
currently.

standing orders is used as stickies.... so if you date the thing, and 
then get wounded, people will know better than to follow it blindly

especially ones that say... move in 2 turns... and remained the same for 
10 turns.


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss