[Discuss] Lords and Armies
psymann
psymann at hotmail.com
Tue Jul 1 12:50:14 CEST 2008
One thing I'm not really sure about at the moment, and hoping someone
can help me with:
We have these armies in each realm. My understanding is that knights
are placed in the armies by their lords as part of the knight's oath to
a lord. ie Lord says "Here, have some tax gold" and knight says
"Thanks, and in return I will manage my estate to benefit your region
and fight for you in the army".
So therefore, the first thing I think is that nobles with no oaths would
never have reason to join the army. And I think that fits with the game
as I don't think you can join an army without having a lord first
(though not sure whether those people with 0% oaths can be put in an
army - I'd assume that they can't).
But then what confuses me is why would a Lord end up in an army? To
whom are they committed to provide a service, that causes them to be in
the army? Their Duke, perhaps?
But then why would a Duke ever end up in the army? Or a ruler?
From what I can see, being in the army is a service you provide to your
lord. So since the ruler doesn't have a lord, why would they ever be in
an army?
It's all a bit confusing.
And then, once you have rulers and lords in an army, being ordered
around by simple knights, it becomes yet more confusing - it makes
little sense to me for a ruler to be being ordered around, yet it also
makes little sense to me for a member of the army not to be ordered
around by its marshal. So when a marshal is a simple knight and the
army contains the lord/duke/ruler, how does this work?
psymann
--
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss-moderated
mailing list