[Discuss] Oaths of fealty and their confliction with other orders

[Rob McDonald]

On 3/12/08, Tom Vogt <tom at lemuria.org> wrote:
>
> Rob McDonald schrieb:
>
> > There is a debate and argument going on in Eston at the moment about a
> > conflict of orders, and what supercedes what.
>
>
> Good.
>
> I won't help you. That kind of conflict is exactly what keeps the game
> interesting. It allows people to make choices. It forces people to make
> difficult choices, choices with consequences.



Yes, that is true, but there were also issues which seemed to directly
contravene your policies on who can issue orders, which you strongly
reinforce with lightning bolts. It would appear some guidance is necessary,
otherwise the discussion could culminate in them getting the completely
wrong idea about miltary
hierarchy, and then getting killed by you when they put it into practice.

Anyway, I have no idea how it has played out now, I was only passing through
on my way to Dwilight. Maybe they're still going at it, anyone from Eston
who knows?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20080312/7d1b6deb/attachment.htm