[Discuss] Cato as a name on DWI?

[Märt Reose]

Rakaarox wrote:
> Following the storyline? Nothing is written in stone, someone could 
> quite easily do an RP that goes against whatever plans someone else has, 
> and they would have to change their storyline if they'd planned one out.

Uhm no. no one can RP my family. You cant do a RP that goes against my 
plans. Ofcourse judges executing people doesnt count as that is my 
choice(making the char available for execution.. ie getting bans and 
such) By storyline I mean long time plans. How I think my chars future 
would be. Like one will stay in his realm till its death or that another 
char will become an infiltraitor and turn into evil.

> I wanted to create an adventurer on an different island to the one I 
> originally had one on. To do that I had to delete two characters, the 
> original adventurer and one of my oldest characters. It was RP'd and 
> done properly, with the old character opting for a quiet retirement, but 
> the reasons behind it were because I wanted a character elsewhere.
> 
> How is that wrong? Is that powergaming?
> 
> The way I see it, as long as the characters that go to Dwilight stay 
> within the requirements of Serious Medieval Atmosphere, it shouldn't 
> matter what happened to bring them there.
> 
> If someone cannot access their computer for a while and their character 
> auto pauses, that isn't part of the 'storyline' so should anyone that 
> has happened to be banned as well?

You are exxagarating. You can do with your family what you want as long 
as it is done within the rules.

If you dont have a storyline then it is fine. Ofcourse times change, but 
the main princible stays.

I just state that if I would have to delete my 2 chars to gain the OOC 
satisfactory that I finally can get to DWI then I would feel like a 
powergamer. As the lives of my chars should have gone ahead. Take it as 
you want. This topic sounds like closed.

Märt