[Discuss] [Feature request] Kings as Dukes/Lords

[Märt Reose]

psymann wrote:
> I'd like to request quite the opposite.  I'd like it if Kings, Judges, 
> Bankers and Generals were all unable to lead a region or marshal an army.
> 
> By allowing people to be both one of the four main positions, and lead a 
> region as well, you reduce the number of positions for other players. 
> There are fewer positions than characters (probably fewer than players), 
> but at the moment, you can have a character who is Banker, Duke and Army 
> Marshal all at once.  And while that undoubtedly gives them lots to get 
> involved with, it means two other people now don't get to experience a 
> character as a Duke/Marshal.  And that's just at a character level - a 
> player can have, I think, up to fifteen positions (though I don't recall 
> seeing more than about eight) all for himself, while many others have zero.
> 
> Can we not balance out the positions a little more?
> 
> psymann

Hmm why it is bad to have multiple positions? Why it is wrong to have 
uberpowerful nobles? In RP perspective it is all good.

I understand that sometimes it is boring without positions and that 
taking positions away from people will give you more chance to get them.

But I dont think the solution is to limit the number of positions one 
can have. It would be another game mechanical restriction to the RP 
which has no real RP point what so ever.

It must be done by players. Like I dont want to hold very much titles. I 
like sharing the fun. But it really should be the decision of the player 
or character. Not the decision of game mechanics. It is more boring to 
have more strict rules.

Also the reason I suggested it is that so it would be more realistic.

Märt,