[Discuss] remove "Orders"
Jaune Cosula
cosula at gmail.com
Mon Feb 4 13:36:36 CET 2008
2008/2/4, Timothy Collett <danaris at mac.com>:
>
> On Feb 4, 2008, at 1:41 AM, Jaune Cosula wrote:
> > What i try to ask, is it inaligble right to ignore "requests"?
>
>
> Is it listed on the Inalienable Rights page in the Wiki?
>
> Has Tom *ever* said that it's forbidden to fine someone for ignoring
> requests?
Nope, i guess i just got wrong impression, i got impression that noble has
right to say "no!" to his superior and get away from it. My bad.
I simply have diffrent view of nobility at army. When you are at army, you
are given orders to follow, if you are noble you get orders from noble
higher at military hierarchy, not request you might get request from same
ranked noble. Whole army consept depends on orders and fullfilling those.
Armies dont work, or ever worked based on requests. You do as you are
ordered, you can question order, but you must obey it. Other than that army
turns to chaos and is not functioning as it should.
I have no idea why noble cant be ordered by his superior? Why would King
have to beg his marshall to invade City, why would high marshall have to beg
his marshalls to get in certain region, why would marshalls has to beg their
armies to move? that just dont sound right and most of all it makes General
and Marshalls sound weak.
If you are assigned to army by your liege, it means you do as that army
leader orders... Have you ever heard General or Marshall to say his army:
Would you Knight Timothy move your troops to City of Massilion and start
take over there, if you dont have something else on your mind... please.
Real General would say:
Knight Timothy and his unit will move to City of Massilion and start take
over as soon as possible.
well, end of rant :) I guess i can live with that concept, i just dont feel
comfortable if i have to request armies to move instead of order them.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20080204/f0e2a0c6/attachment.htm
More information about the Discuss
mailing list