[Discuss] cheating or just smart?
Szymon Trapp
szymontrapp at gmail.com
Wed Apr 16 05:05:49 CEST 2008
On 16/04/2008, Matt Runyon <m.runyon at comcast.net> wrote:
> Jeff J. Wilson wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discuss-bounces at news.battlemaster.org
> > [mailto:discuss-bounces at news.battlemaster.org] On Behalf Of Timothy Collett
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 4:38 PM
> > To: BattleMaster general discussion list
> > Subject: Re: [Discuss] cheating or just smart?
> >
> > The primary reason a strategic secession is an abuse is because of
> > capital-only recruitment. If you're seceding for reasons that have
> > nothing to do with OOC-reason-imposed gameplay restrictions, I don't
> > see any reason to call that abuse.
> > ______________________________________
> >
> > But is breaking up a realm for the sole purpose of getting around a treaty
> > believable role-play? It sounds like power-gaming to me.
> >
> How is that power-gaming? Deceitful, yes. Evil, possibly. But it gets
> around an IC treaty, not any game mechanics. Things like that happened
> in real life, too. <wryly points to his own country financing puppet
> states to fight communism, and to the Crusader states for more period
> examples>
>
I also don't think it's power-gaming. That's just politcs, it's not
always nice, sometimes it gets really dirty. And you can deal with it
in game, by showing others how deceitfully this realm is behaving.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list