[Discuss] cheating or just smart?
Timothy Collett
danaris at mac.com
Wed Apr 16 01:37:57 CEST 2008
On Apr 15, 2008, at 7:31 PM, psymann wrote:
> Hmm, if you secede in order to create a second realm to wage war with
> one, as in this case, but the capital is _not_ closer, would that
> still
> count as strategic? It's strategic, but only to bypass the treaty,
> not
> to take advantage of game mechanics... so how would that be
> considered?
> I'd be tempted to say that was ok...
>
> *looks over to Timothy hopefully*
The primary reason a strategic secession is an abuse is because of
capital-only recruitment. If you're seceding for reasons that have
nothing to do with OOC-reason-imposed gameplay restrictions, I don't
see any reason to call that abuse.
Timothy Collett
Anaris Family
More information about the Discuss
mailing list