[Discuss] Vulgarity Option

[Shane O'neil]

> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:21:17 -0400
> From: TheKobald at tampabay.rr.com
> To: discuss at news.battlemaster.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Vulgarity Option
> 
> Shane O'neil wrote:
> > Local is a bad word to describe it. When I think local. I think my 
> > local suburb. Not the country I'm in. There is no reason that a 
> > foreign noble should know about your bad language or vulgarity. The 
> > realm decency should matter. It should matter a lot. If it's a load of 
> > Vikings, there should be no penalty for speaking a little vulgar among 
> > each other. I think the main problem is that people take it very badly 
> > when they get the message saying they have been vulgar. Because it 
> > hurts their characters stats. Yes, I know, it's measly point of 
> > honour, but still a loss. I think people will start looking a things 
> > differently once this new stat system gets introduced. The current one 
> > makes your characters suffer for RPing them a certain way. etc, being 
> > vulgar.
> >
> > -- Shane
> 
> 
> Vikings are considered by most of the rest of the world as honourless.

I don't think I was clear. I'm talking about how honour affects what limits
your char has, meaning if you have little honour you will have a small unit
you won't be eligible for a government position etc. Because this is
attribute is so necessary, it forces people to roleplay a certain way.

-- Shane

_________________________________________________________________
News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now!
http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070904/a29b7087/attachment.htm