[Discuss] Vulgarity Option
Alex Davies
the1exile at hotmail.co.uk
Mon Sep 3 19:04:19 CEST 2007
>From: "Jonathon Taylor" <jonathon.its.never.enough at googlemail.com>
>... what? How on earth, in Medieval Europe, could public ally, asking, some
>one else to lick their ass be anything but unnoble? And still, that point
>makes little sense. I saw the message my self and it was very much meant
>like an insult (you aren't in Sandalak James so you can't possibly argue
>any
>other point), and on top of this, neither is eating your enemies. Now in no
>way am I saying I don't want to see this, it's funny as hell! I encourage
>it
>in fact, but it's just more than one more evident reason, that the
>Vulgarity
>option just doesn't work when trying to apply "context" to a game as
>diverse
>as BattleMaster.
>
I think James meant "how do you know someone didn't report that message as
vulgar and the player whose message was judged vulgar just didn't complain
about losing the point of honour?"
Given the most recent emssage that I judged for vulgarity on SWI, though, I
would have so say some people are using the link just for the hell of it.
The1exile (AKA SniperChief)
"The greatest work of fiction, since vows of fidelity were included in the
French marriage service."
--Captain Edmund Blackadder
_________________________________________________________________
The next generation of Hotmail is here! http://www.newhotmail.co.uk
More information about the Discuss
mailing list