[Discuss] Advanced Battle Formations
Chuong Huynh
chuongbm at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 02:56:07 CET 2007
On Nov 19, 2007 4:39 PM, Jeff J. Wilson <jjwilson61 at cox.net> wrote:
> My marshal is now able to use some of the more advanced battle formations
> and we had a situation recently where a superior force was attacking us
> and
> it looked like some of the formations might be useful. However, my
> general
> stated that nearly everyone she knows that used them have lost their
> battles.
>
> Is she right? I have noticed that I never see anything but infantry wall,
> infantry charge, and archer opening used, but I thought it was because
> most
> marshals aren't experienced enough, but I guess most marshals just don't
> think they work. It would be fun if I had advanced formations that I
> could
> actually use as marshal.
>
>
Depends, what does she mean by lost their battles. The game told them they
lost the battle or they actually got their butts kicked. The game has told
me I lost battles which I consider very decisive victories kill more enemy
troops than number of men you lose. The advance formations are useful, you
might still lose the battle, but you may be able to do much more damage to
your enemies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071119/4e51079b/attachment.htm
More information about the Discuss
mailing list