[Discuss] (no subject)

[Jonathon Taylor]

On 30/05/07, James <TheKobald at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> dgk at mailbox.gr wrote:
> >
> > What klind of statement is that?
> > I will be able to assasinate you when i will be able? wow, unbeilivable.
> >
> > The question is why i am not able now, why I am not able but you are
> able to start a TO, and why i cannot murder your unit's men also.
> >
> > Dgk
> >
> >
> It's for game play reasons.  It isn't very fun to be constantly wounded.


But it's also allowing a noble to continue actions like looting, starting
take overs etc, etc without the fear of infiltrators hitting them.
I agree, there isn't anything worse than being wounded again and again, but
you aught not be able to use this time (wether intentionall or not) while
you are invulnerable to do things like start take overs and do significant
amounts of looting.

For how long does the invulnerability last?

-- 
The Bridges Fall To The Ground,
And You Say You Have Sacrificed?

                           (\__/)
                           (='.'=)
                           (")_(")
This is Bunny. Copy and paste him into your signature to help him gain world
domination.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070530/c1f16a83/attachment.htm