[Discuss] Feature Request: 2nd OOC tag

[K Ann]

On 5/18/07, Vinnie <vinnietje at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2007/5/18, K Ann <knerdess at gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> > On 5/17/07, Tom Vogt <tom at lemuria.org> wrote:
> > > K Ann schrieb:
> > > > Again with assumptions.  Nothing was done because who I was attached
> > > > too.  Tom knew about and decided to do nothing and there was no
> > > > Titans.  That is what ended my interest in the game the first time.
> > >
> > > "There was no Titans" - so this was very, very long ago. Why do you
> > > bring it up again now?
> >
> > Why not?  Have you changed your opinion that much?  From the way you
> talk
> > about people to others recently I would say you have changed for the
> worst.
> > So why would things be that different?
>
> Actually, I'd say it's the opposite. In the 3 years I have been
> playing I've seen people that punish inactive smited. In fact, often
> to the point that I wonder if we aren't exaggerating in this "everyone
> can be as active or inactive as he wants" thing.
>
> So I don't think what you are saying makes much sense, actually.


I don't think I've played much in the last 3 years.  My account self deleted
at the beginning of the Titans I think.  I had to go realms were I could be
protected by friends for not logging on every turn.

When I stopped playing entirely was when I was kicked out of two realms for
not following orders.  I didn't follow orders because I was inactive.  Those
were sent to the Titans and they said they didn't judge roleplay.

Maybe it is different now.  But I'd be surprised.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070519/3b2961de/attachment.htm