[Discuss] Strategies with Small Army Groups

[Anthony Cerqueira]

On 5/17/07, James <TheKobald at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Anthony Cerqueira wrote:
> >
> >
> > I've seen regions go from 0 (or even negative population) to thousands
> > in less then a year. I mean I'm certain monsters eat kids, they're
> > small sure, but they're not tough and stringy, so 0 pop must mean
> > something because when they hit it, monsters stop eating.
> >
> >  As for paying people to train, why in the world would I waste good
> > money on that? I'm their lord, they will shoot arrows every week and
> > swing those sticks or they will die until the peasants realize I mean
> > buisness. Sure they won't be very good, but most soldiers aren't. If
> > you want to good, professional soldiers, you go hire them and get the
> > nice high training/equpiment to reflect the cost you spend on them.
> >
> If you had bothered to read the entire thing, and not just stopped where
> you wanted to, you would have read the next words:  and immigrating.
> People saw land no one was on and moved there.


-chuckle- I did read all of it, thank you, I did not however give it serious
consideration given the scope of the repopulation. This may have been an
error and I will consider it more fully in light of your ideas.


Most of the soldiers are just that.  Why do you think they have crappy
> training/equipment.  You just described exactly how the game works now.
>

I know, that's what I was trying to do. Justin was saying that every soldier
is a proffessional and I was pointing out that most aren't by explaining
exactly what you have just been saying.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070517/5942cfb1/attachment.htm