News

[Discuss] Estates Problems

Dorian Gray portrait.of.dorian.gray at gmail.com
Fri May 4 17:52:40 CEST 2007


On 5/5/07, Jeff Wilson <jjwilson61 at cox.net> wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discuss-bounces at news.battlemaster.org [mailto:discuss-
> > bounces at news.battlemaster.org] On Behalf Of James
> > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 7:30 AM
> > To: BattleMaster general discussion list
> > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Estates Problems
> >
> > Timothy Collett wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, you would think so, but apparently not enough.  (Is that even
> > fully coded yet?  I've not seen it in action...)
> > >
> > >
> > I believe it's fully coded, but it hasn't been around long.  Things
> > don't change over night, it takes time.
> >
> My character in The Colonies lost honor when his region was taken
> over.  If
> this is new, I'm not sure I like the change.  It's going to make it hard
> to
> find a lord for a border region that changes hands all the time.


Half the time there's no lord due to claims anyway, unless someone's bought
the title.

How about we also dramatically increase or decrease the difficulty of TO's
relative to how many regions have already been taken? If the first one or
two TO's only take four or five days at most, but the sixth or seventh takes
two weeks, while the realm being attacked has TO's go by in two days. That
makes it advantageous for neither realm to go too far.

Or, the more regions are taken, the more the home population gets discontent
because of the lack of an armed presence keeping them in line / the
independence movements caused by so many regions having claims spills over
into once loyal regions, while the defending realm's people start getting
disgruntled about the lack of leadership shown / the constant stream of
casualties and start having ideas of rebellion and a Peasant's Republic. The
longer the war goes, the worse it gets.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070505/e5129915/attachment.htm


More information about the Discuss mailing list