[Discuss] Estates Problems

[Dorian Gray]

On 5/4/07, James <TheKobald at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Timothy Collett wrote:
> >
> >
> > You miss the point.
> >
> > The problem most (I think) have been complaining of in this thread is
> that there is no incentive for the *defenders* to accept or offer a peace
> treaty: they know that if they surrender, they'll only be a shadow of their
> former selves, and think it more worthwhile to force the attackers to
> destroy them, thus damaging their reputation and making the claims last a
> long time.
> >
> > It is, of course, quite ridiculous, and almost no one of the time would
> have acted that way (unless they were mad).  But since there is really no
> significant negative consequence to the players (or even the characters!)
> for having their realm destroyed, it becomes a pretty viable option.
> >
> >
>
> There is now that lords and knights will lose honour when their region
> is taken over etc.


Have all the characters that held a title in the last, say, 14 days of the
realm's existence die. Kind of realistic, captured nobles with no place to
go might well get hanged. That'll provide some incentive.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070504/4ad55fe7/attachment.htm