[Discuss] Arrested infiltrator abuse?

[Joe Truba]

On 3/28/07, James <TheKobald at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Justin Licht wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/28/07, *Josiah Allen* <josiahallen at gmail.com
> > <mailto:josiahallen at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Even if they could ban immediatly, I don't think there's any abuse
> >     whatsoever in letting you stew in the dungeon, I can't think of a
> >     more logical reaction to protect the realm against you, and the
> >     costs of doing so are the risks you escape before the ban is in
> >     place, so it's got pros and cons.
> >
> >     --
> >     "Growth in wisdom may be exactly measured by decrease in bitterness"
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     Unsubscribing and other list options:
> >     http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >     <http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> >
> >
> >
> > Well in the fictional scenario where they could ban immeaditely, but
> > wait until just before the family buy out option shows up, that is
> > abuse. You are using ooc knowledge about how long that takes IC.
>
> Yes, that is what I was saying.  Of course keeping you for all 7 days
> would be IC but to keep you just long enough to us OOC mechanics and
> knowledge is what I was addressing.
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>

But that is all based on the false assumption that you can ban immediately.
Trust me, if I could ban immediately I would, but I can't, so I end up
letting them rot in jail for awhile.

-- 
"We have won!" say they.
"Nay," say I, "The war has just begun!"
And Into The Void They Went
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070329/9257f1d8/attachment.htm