[Discuss] Arrested infiltrator abuse?

[James]

Justin Licht wrote:
>
>
> On 3/28/07, *Josiah Allen* <josiahallen at gmail.com 
> <mailto:josiahallen at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Even if they could ban immediatly, I don't think there's any abuse
>     whatsoever in letting you stew in the dungeon, I can't think of a
>     more logical reaction to protect the realm against you, and the
>     costs of doing so are the risks you escape before the ban is in
>     place, so it's got pros and cons.
>
>     -- 
>     "Growth in wisdom may be exactly measured by decrease in bitterness"
>
>
>     --
>     Unsubscribing and other list options:
>     http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>     <http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
>
>
>
> Well in the fictional scenario where they could ban immeaditely, but 
> wait until just before the family buy out option shows up, that is 
> abuse. You are using ooc knowledge about how long that takes IC.

Yes, that is what I was saying.  Of course keeping you for all 7 days 
would be IC but to keep you just long enough to us OOC mechanics and 
knowledge is what I was addressing.