[Discuss] Bans vs. Liege's Rights

[Jeff Wilson]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-bounces at news.battlemaster.org [mailto:discuss-
> bounces at news.battlemaster.org] On Behalf Of Alex Davies
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:46 AM
> To: discuss at news.battlemaster.org
> Subject: RE: [Discuss] Bans vs. Liege's Rights
> 
> >From: "Jeff Wilson" <jjwilson61 at cox.net>
> >
> >Under the new allegiance system, should a judge be allowed to ban a
> knight
> >without the concurrence of his liege?  Or to put it another way, should a
> >liege be able to protect his knight's from the judge?
> >
> >I think it would be more fun and more in the flavor of the new system to
> >allow a region lord or duke to protect his knights from the wrath of the
> >judge.  Of course the lord would be a valid target for the judge.
> >
> >I'm not sure how that would work within the game though.  The power of
> the
> >judge to ban could be limited to unaligned knights and region lords.  The
> >region lords could then be given the power to ban their vassals, but I'm
> >not
> >sure that you want to give judge powers to the region lords.
> >
> >I guess the easiest way would be to give the region lords the power to
> lift
> >bans on their own vassals.
> >
> 
> I believe that's already covered with the good and bad marks system.

What's covered?  Is a judge not allowed to ban a character with good marks?
What about one with neither good nor bad marks?  There isn't any explanation
on the page for what good and bad marks do and the help page just says
"(currently being reworked...)", so please forgive my ignorance.