[Discuss] Bans vs. Liege's Rights
Alex Davies
the1exile at hotmail.co.uk
Tue Mar 27 17:45:31 CEST 2007
>From: "Jeff Wilson" <jjwilson61 at cox.net>
>
>Under the new allegiance system, should a judge be allowed to ban a knight
>without the concurrence of his liege? Or to put it another way, should a
>liege be able to protect his knight's from the judge?
>
>I think it would be more fun and more in the flavor of the new system to
>allow a region lord or duke to protect his knights from the wrath of the
>judge. Of course the lord would be a valid target for the judge.
>
>I'm not sure how that would work within the game though. The power of the
>judge to ban could be limited to unaligned knights and region lords. The
>region lords could then be given the power to ban their vassals, but I'm
>not
>sure that you want to give judge powers to the region lords.
>
>I guess the easiest way would be to give the region lords the power to lift
>bans on their own vassals.
>
I believe that's already covered with the good and bad marks system.
The1exile (AKA SniperChief)
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane
mittam.
_________________________________________________________________
Solve the Conspiracy and win fantastic prizes.
http://www.theconspiracygame.co.uk/
More information about the Discuss
mailing list