[Discuss] Re: Auto-bans

[Anthony Anderson]

On 3/23/07, Samuel Knowlton <sam at iamsam.org> wrote:
>
> The only way it's "more fluid" is that oaths of fealty are now oaths of
> convenience, since you can't ban somebody after they've left your realm. I
> don't mind if maybe it requires the liege's OK to do it, but there should
> be
> some possible repurcussion for abandoning your sworn oath.
>

Backing out on an oath should definitely result in a loss of
honor/prestige.  IMO, it should also be directly proportional to the oath's
promised tax %.  Higher valued knights typically are going to get a higher
%.  Also somehow factored in there should be good marks/bad marks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070323/6382394d/attachment.htm