[Discuss] Options to punish adventurers

[Justin Licht]

On 3/1/07, Jeremy Stephens <jstephens at georgefox.edu> wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-bounces at news.battlemaster.org
> [mailto:discuss-bounces at news.battlemaster.org] On Behalf Of James
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 7:46 AM
> To: BattleMaster general discussion list
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Options to punish adventurers
>
> Jeremy Stephens wrote:
> > I can't help but notice the "almost all adventurers"... So does that
> > mean it is possible for an adventure to get high enough prestige/honor
>
> > to dodge the hangman's noose?
> >
> >
> >
> Yes and some of them already have enough honour.
>
> -----
>
> Just out of curiosity... What are the highest out there so far?  There
> are a few adventurers with 8 honor and I believe at least one adventure
> with 12 prestige.
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>


To clarify, since I know some people still aren't 100% sure on the whole
execute without a ban thing:

Outlaws are named so for a reason. Because of their dishonourable actions
(or lowly birth) they are no longer offered protection by the courts and the
due process of law is not applicable for them. Hence, that is why the judge
can get away with toturing them to death. The law doesn't protect them.

A freeman, however, is within the law and protected by it. A character with
four honor or less is an outlaw.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070301/3a4e8499/attachment.htm