[Discuss] An observation
John P. Murphy
john.p.murphy at Dartmouth.EDU
Sun Jun 10 20:38:47 CEST 2007
On Jun 10, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Tom Vogt wrote:
> Samuel Knowlton schrieb:
>> It's not the ruler or the Duke who's making us do it. It's the
>> game. "Well, civil work is boring, so let's just lose all the
>> regions that need civil work" is hardly a solution.
>
> Maybe I should add a lower threshold of "don't bother", essentially
> making things that give +1% into things that give nothing.
>
> Really, I can understand why that's not fun. But still, there _are_
> more effective ways than putting everyone to slave labour.
I like the estates concept, where nobles can support their home
region without actually being there. Perhaps it should be possible
to hire a peasant militia to spend a week raising production or
hunting down rebels, and then leave the region. (Said militia could
then be slaughtered by a foe or by monsters or undead should the
owner fail to protect them)
John
More information about the Discuss
mailing list