News

[Discuss] Friendly secessions

J. Stephens jstephens at rocketmail.com
Sun Jun 3 15:47:20 CEST 2007


The thing is, their visibility is not low (everyone knows about the titans, 
as well they should, considering they are the enforcers of the rules), only 
their transparency, and there is a big *big* difference there. We can see 
the titans but as we don't see what they're doing right, the view towards 
them is naturally biased and only leads to people being afraid to talk about 
them.

Can we get a reason that is acceptable to everyone to give the titans some 
credit, rather than just taking it on faith? It's hard to trust their 
judgement when most of what you hear is their wrong decisions, or when 
you're the one who feels wronged and can't actually talk to anyone about it 
(because it will generally be shot down as whining) or don't get a response 
through the proper channels.

-- 


For those of you that have issues with the way the Titans do something, how about if ALL Titans decisions are posted as an in realm message (or island wide if it's deemed to affect the entire island - ie, friendly succession, etc) when they finally making a "ruling"?  Something like:

TITANS RULING:
The following issue was sent to the Titans for review:  Several players were thought to be multi-cheating and the evidence supplied was not satisfactory to prove that is the case.

or

TITANS RULING:
The following issue was sent to the Titans for review:  Lord Dirtymouth was accused of ordering his vassals to recruit Infantry and has been found guilt of doing so.  He receives this public reprimand this time.  Continued abuse this was will result in a temporary account lock.

etc....

By having each decision posted realm wide whether or not the action resulted in any punitive action, we may not agree with the decision but at least we know a decision was made.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070603/99ae2128/attachment.htm


More information about the Discuss mailing list