[Discuss] Voting for local lords
Alex Davies
the1exile at hotmail.co.uk
Fri Jun 1 01:41:57 CEST 2007
>From: Christopher Subich <csubich at subich.com>
>I don't mind binding referendums in the abstract, but this is way too
>inflexible. Ideally, one person (Grand Justiciar? Ruler? Responsible
>Duke?) should be able to call for a binding referrendum on issues like
>this, but he should also have the option to set the parameters finely.
>Thus, what the realm does would become a matter of law and convention,
>rather than arbitrary game mechanics.
>
Do bear in mind the feature has only been around for a few hours.
I would be more concerned about the fact that local lords are the only
people who can nominate themselves for a lordship - which of course, they
won't be able to hold. So unless the option for the ruler/duke to appoint
has also vanished, it's a lot of fuss about nothing.
The1exile (AKA SniperChief)
Clarity is the essence of beauty, mystery the essence of desire.
_________________________________________________________________
Could you be the guest MSN Movies presenter? Click Here to Audition
http://www.lightscameraaudition.co.uk
More information about the Discuss
mailing list