[Discuss] Title buying question

[Josiah Allen]

On 7/12/07, LilWolf <bmdiscuss at lilwolf.biz> wrote:
>
> Josiah Allen wrote:
> >
> > My point being, once success occurs, he is the Count legally, and got
> > there as legally as any other Count.  How can you then say he is
> > guilty of fraud the week before, if he's been vindicated this week.
> > The success negates the failure.
> >
>
> It's a bit more like an infiltrator trying to stab a noble and failing
> the first time and getting identified. He tries to stab again and this
> time he's successful. The one getting stabbed has a pretty good idea who
> it might have been.
>
> In the case of buying titles, failing once and then succeeding the
> second time should be enough to lay some very hefty doubt upon the
> person who bought the title. Enough to eventually lead to some action
> against the person, if the realm so chooses.
>
> --
> Join the Last.fm group for Battlemaster
> http://www.last.fm/group/Battlemaster
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>


No...see there's no difference between assault and attempted assault in
terms of law.

A claim is a like legal proof.

I see it more like if I am found guilty, appeal the case, and then am
exonerated.

If they accept your claim B, then they're saying your claim A must also have
been valid, because it's practically the same thing.

However, if that's too much a stretch and you feel that the claim A was
clearly a criminal act because it wasn't accepted despite the later
remission, then you still have to accept that claim B was valid and he
should keep his post, but the lord deserves some punishment for filing bad
papers.

If Tom thinks differently, he should just give you one chance per region to
buy a claim.  If you fail the people never trust you again.


-- 
"Growth in wisdom may be exactly measured by decrease in bitterness"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070712/6c5b451b/attachment.htm