[Discuss] Wikipedia, IC and OOC

[Joe Truba]

On 2/3/07, Simon Willems <simon.willems at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> 2007/2/3, Joe Truba <bannable at gmail.com>:
> >
> > Is any information on the wiki considered to be available IC? And if so,
> > is it 'allowed' to create a page (such as
> > /Church_of_Estahsism/Secret_Operations/Finished, which is what brought this
> > question to my mind) and then state that none of the information on that
> > page can be used IC or IG?
> >
> > --
> > "We have won!" say they.
> > "Nay," say I, "The war has just begun!"
> > And Into The Void They Went
> >
> >
> > --
> > Unsubscribing and other list options:
> > http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
> I (together with Eirk) have made that page non-IC-knowledge because it
> could really get our characters into trouble.
> I think players should indeed follow the guidelines of a page, and when
> it's indicated it is not for IC/IG use, they should respect it.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Simon Willems
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>

The problem with that is obvious though. Just like on IRC, things on the
wiki will leak into IC if you want it to  or not. If something like that
will get you into trouble, and you want to make sure noone knows about it
IG, then don't make the pages - at least this is what I think.

-- 
"We have won!" say they.
"Nay," say I, "The war has just begun!"
And Into The Void They Went
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070203/33ca4f65/attachment.htm