News

[Discuss] Change to vulgarity?

Tessa snow15cat at aol.com
Tue Dec 11 19:07:53 CET 2007


I rather like the idea about positions. It's more  incentive to keep a 
civil tongue than one point of honour loss. I see only a small 
possibility for abuse though, as opposed to a large one. If you report 
someone for vulgarity and what they said clearly isn't vulgar then they 
won't get marked for it. After all, it's not the reporter who rates the 
message, it's randomly selected people from across the continent. 
Surely they all don't have it in for you. And if someone is constantly 
falsely reporting they get in trouble don't they?

Though I agree that maybe the marks should disappear over time, maybe 
after a number of RL months. Just because someone was a foul mouthed 
punk kid doesn't mean they can't grow up into a fine nobleman someday.
________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
http://webmail.aol.com


More information about the Discuss mailing list