[Discuss] time to scrap the moderated list

[psymann]

James wrote:
> Tessa wrote:
>> "..you can have one area for serious and good discussion that Tom
>> reads, and another section for the round-in-circles discussion, and yet
>> another for all the crap that no-one needs to read unless they're bored."
>>
>> That sounds an awful lot like moderated-list unmoderated-list haha
>>

Yes.  Exactly the point.  It does the same thing, but the difference is 
you only have to subscribe to one thing - in fact, depending on your 
mood, you can just access the unmoderated one when you want to.  Oh, and 
another difference is that you don't have to wait for moderation.  In 
other words, the forum can't be much worse than the D-list if it does 
the same thing, but might actually perform the split better.

>>   
> No, in a forum they'll bleed together.

Not if they're moderated well.

psymann