[Discuss] Buy Title issue (was: Infils stealing tax gold)

[Jeremy Stephens]

-----Original Message-----
...And even if that were not the case, it still doesn't make this OOC
abuse.

Fact 1: the character had ample IC motives for doing what he did
Fact 2: the character had ample IC information sources for knowing he
*could* do what he did
Fact 3: the actions he took exploited no bugs, violated no inalienable
rights, and used no features in ways that Tom has forbidden.

If he had OOC motives for it, it doesn't matter.  Consider this
scenario:
1) Player A dislikes Player B OOC
2) Player A's character is an infiltrator in a realm at war with Player
B's character, who is ruler
3) Player A's character stabs Player B's character *because* he dislikes
him OOC

Is that OOC abuse?  No, because there's no necessity of an OOC
motivation, and there's no abuse.

What Nate did was kinda shady, it was annoying as all heck, and it was
somewhat un-sporting.  It's certainly not anything I would have done, or
suggested.

It was also perfectly legal, and did not warrant any punishment that I
can see.

Timothy Collett
Anaris Family

------------------------------------

Easy, cougar.  I was not accusing Nate of doing anything illegal.  As
you have said everything he did was within the limits of the game.  Nor
was I suggesting any punishment.  I am merely saying it was
premeditated.  As for the RP aspect of what Nate does with his in game
family... Well I have my opinion on that but I'll leave it in the game.