[Discuss] Dictator abusing power

[AJ]

On 9/24/06, Alex Davies <the1exile at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >From: Mark Moss <battlemaster at mmoss.org>
> >
> >On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 20:46 +0100, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> > > You have a right to choose your class, you don't have a right to
> > > choose your realm. Banning priests doesn't stop them being priests, it
> > > just stops them being in your realm.
> >
> >The same could be said for any class.  I don't see any reason why
> >banning a priest for being a priest would have different consequences
> >for banning a hero for being a hero.
>
> Ban a hero for saying "I don;t want your death on my conscience" instead,
> and would that be a breach of inalienable right? I thought the right
> covered
> choosing your class, not the consequences thereof (hence why you can
> assign
> different tax points to each class).
>
> >You can probably ban a priest for doing priestly things, but I'd make it
> >absolutely clear that the priest was banned for specific actions rather
> >that simply for being a priest.
>
> I'd just ban him for being openly a member of a religion.
>


Weaseling around, sidestepping the inalieanable right in any matter is
absolutely a no-no if I have understood Tom's intentions correctly.
Personally, my opinion, do not even venture down that path..

It's absolutely, strictly, completely off limits

aJ
-- 
bLogging at - http://ramblings.ajaxed.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060924/dd684df9/attachment.htm