[Discuss] Banned nobles can't protest

[AJ]

On 9/19/06, Anthony Anderson <phoenixsunrise at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hm.  Either it's been edited slightly or I'm just imagining things.
> Chances are it's the second option.  My bad.
>
> Still, that should be the way it's looked at.  Why should a banned noble
> be able to protest his own banning.  If that were possible, why wouldn't
> every banned noble take such action?
>


A banned noble should be allowed because a single noble protesting will have
no effect on the judge's standing. But for a runaway judge who bans half or
more of the realm on a whim, it _will_ have an effect. And if the lot of
banned nobles are supported by a few not banned, the judge by be deposed.

aJ
-- 
bLogging at - http://ramblings.ajaxed.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060919/7215d4df/attachment.htm