[Discuss] Banned nobles can't protest
Srirangan
srirangan at gmail.com
Tue Sep 19 08:46:46 CEST 2006
Till the time the ban comes into effect, I think the protest option can be
made available - because technically he is still a noble in the realm.
On 9/19/06, Anthony Anderson <phoenixsunrise at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/19/06, AJ <j.anant at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Why is it that banned characters are not allowed to protest? Should they
> > not be allowed to protest as well as rebel (with enough support)?
> > A runaway judge could ban half the realm and since they cannot protest,
> > he will not be threatened since the other half is not enough to depose him!
> >
>
> I would imagine the real "bug" is that banned characters still count as
> being active members of a realm. If a banned character were removed from
> things like % of protests required, it should remedy the situation.
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060919/40946ea9/attachment.htm
More information about the Discuss
mailing list