News

[Discuss] OOC Bans

James TheKobald at tampabay.rr.com
Tue Sep 5 15:19:55 CEST 2006


AJ wrote:
> On 9/4/06, *D. Nicko* <la_romana2 at yahoo.com 
> <mailto:la_romana2 at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
>     I have a question about a situation that may merit an OOC ban.  A
>     player in one of my realms, where I play the ruler, has been
>     accused of multi-cheating.  The accusation comes from another
>     player who also is the ruler in the realm of the other two of
>     player-in-question's characters.  The other realm was where the
>     offense was discovered.  Both characters were banned and the
>     account has since been locked. 
>
>     My question is: Since I don't have any solid evidence other than a
>     locked account and the word of one person, is an OOC Ban
>     appropriate?  (my initial reaction would say yes, but I wanted to
>     be sure).
>
>
>
> That is what the titans are there. If you have suspicions of someone 
> multicheating, report them to the Titans. They will look into the 
> matter. Or report them to Tom. But OOC banning for multicheating on 
> your own should be based or solid, incontrovertible proof.
>
> And if an account is already locked, why bother OOC banning them? They 
> will eventually autopause.
>
> aJ
> -- 
> bLogging at - http://ramblings.ajaxed.net
I didn't get this original message, weird.  However, do you trust your 
battlemaster account to that person's word (it says under the ooc ban 
option that the titans take it very seriously, I don't know how 
seriously but honestly I don't want to find out)?  Accounts get locked 
for more then multi-cheating (and not always permanently).  Furthermore 
if the person has already been reported to the titans and judged that 
means they have already given a punishment they deem worthy.


More information about the Discuss mailing list