[Discuss] OOC Bans
James
TheKobald at tampabay.rr.com
Tue Sep 5 15:19:55 CEST 2006
AJ wrote:
> On 9/4/06, *D. Nicko* <la_romana2 at yahoo.com
> <mailto:la_romana2 at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
> I have a question about a situation that may merit an OOC ban. A
> player in one of my realms, where I play the ruler, has been
> accused of multi-cheating. The accusation comes from another
> player who also is the ruler in the realm of the other two of
> player-in-question's characters. The other realm was where the
> offense was discovered. Both characters were banned and the
> account has since been locked.
>
> My question is: Since I don't have any solid evidence other than a
> locked account and the word of one person, is an OOC Ban
> appropriate? (my initial reaction would say yes, but I wanted to
> be sure).
>
>
>
> That is what the titans are there. If you have suspicions of someone
> multicheating, report them to the Titans. They will look into the
> matter. Or report them to Tom. But OOC banning for multicheating on
> your own should be based or solid, incontrovertible proof.
>
> And if an account is already locked, why bother OOC banning them? They
> will eventually autopause.
>
> aJ
> --
> bLogging at - http://ramblings.ajaxed.net
I didn't get this original message, weird. However, do you trust your
battlemaster account to that person's word (it says under the ooc ban
option that the titans take it very seriously, I don't know how
seriously but honestly I don't want to find out)? Accounts get locked
for more then multi-cheating (and not always permanently). Furthermore
if the person has already been reported to the titans and judged that
means they have already given a punishment they deem worthy.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list