News

[Discuss] Battle with monsters!!!!

Vin vin.raigavin at gmail.com
Sat Oct 21 08:40:19 CEST 2006


On 10/21/06, Paris <parislowenbruck at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Vin,
>
> I see nothing in your report like reducing your men by 6 men. Till the
> very end you were fighting with 37 Archers at your disposal, which actually
> means that if you are missing 6 men, it has happened after the battle.
>
> Have you any other report?
>
> (I wonder if my eyes fool me and II am missing something from the original
> message! O.O )
>
>
ok here is the turn change messages:-

______________
*Unit Status Report*   *(14 hours, 34 minutes ago)*
Wear and tear causes 1 % damage to your unit's equipment.

*Arrival*   *(14 hours, 34 minutes ago)*
You have arrived in <my region>, a Rural region (friendly territory).

*Battle in Zin*   *(14 hours, 34 minutes ago)*

*Battle Results*   *(14 hours, 34 minutes ago)*
*Your scribe has written down this battle report as a Scribe
Note<http://www.battlemaster.org/ShowScribeNote.php?ID=382135&Hash=f9b1733499a6f478>
.*
The battle lasted for 2 hours.
You have gained 1 Honour and 1 Prestige.
You have improved your leadership skill.
None of your men were killed in this battle.
Morale of your troops falls by 31 points. Your men's equipment suffers 7 %
damage. Combat training increases by 1 points. Unit cohesion rises 1 points.
___________________

My men lost Morale as they are a police unit (agreed) and even retreated in
the battle (agreed), but nothing here says about my unit loosing 6 men
(which is quite mysterious).

My unit as of now:-

Dark Police Type: Archers Strength:
31 men Training:
72 % Weapons/Armour:
57% / 62% Equipment Damage:
49 % Morale:
75 % Cohesion:
98 % Total Combat Strength:
416 Designation:
police Last paid:
2 days ago
_____________

Nothing explains this, actually my unit according to the battle
report..wasn't even in a meele fight.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061021/1745a622/attachment.htm


More information about the Discuss mailing list