[Discuss] Battlemaster is a tyranny

[Paris]

I think that we are missing the point here.

As far as I have understood, the concern is not on whether the judge should
be punished or not, but rather if Mickey should be punished for speaking his
opinion loud.

According to my opinion, Mickey has not said anything insulting or bad or
anything, but even if his message was somewhat aggressive, it was based on
his own point of view and I strongly believe that no matter if he was right
or wrong, he should be treated with respect.

Argue with him, yes, but punish him for speaking his thoughts? Why? This is
against fundamental human rights and as it seems to have been a punishment
for his OOC comments it should not be done. I find it very selfish to shut
the mouth of someone who simply does not agree with you.
So is it, worship the GMs and everything will be alright? I refuse to do so.
We are all supposed to be friends here and I do not exclude the GMs. We can
yell at each other (though not advisable, we coulld still do it within some
limits) and argue and speak our opinion loud and get along together.

I am not happy at all, but I will wait what the persons involved have to say
about this. Mickey has a point here and no, I refuse to play a game where I
count not as an individual pesonality with free will and unbiased judement.

I have my own opinion, will you respect it or not? - rhetorical question

-- 
Lucifer Jr. - Kalmar Islands
Esperos - Avamar Selective
Laura - League of Anacan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061014/a608fbad/attachment-0001.htm