News

[Discuss] Moving the Capital

Jim Bowers jbow214 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 11 13:18:10 CEST 2006


I would like to say something about this. I am from LdB and have been there
for over 2 years. I know that we had been discussing on moving the capitol
for at least 1 1/2 years to Grehk. Not for tatical advantage but because
this is where the people had wanted it. For us it made sense. I could go
into detail why, but I won't due to it being my realm I live in. If the
second monster invasion had come maybe 2-3 months later our capitol would
have been already in Grehk. Then after the invasion there was a succession.
Once we took care of that we moved the capitol. Yes, there already was
tension with Riombara. I do believe that is was them that started the war.
(I could be wrong with that so sorry if I am). Now many months later, after
we took many of their regions and they had a succession, we start hearing
about it.

Yes we got lighting bolted for moving, but we decided to keep it there
because that is where we wanted our capitol. It was decided by a popular
vote, not just Nhoc saying so. Granted it probably does help us in the war,
but that was not our initial reason for doing it.

I don't speak a lot in or out of the realm, but I have decided to this time.
There are many irate people saying things and maybe they have a right, but
we have a right also. Thank you for letting me write this.

On 10/11/06, Jaune Cosula <cosula at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Some update and thoughts about this issue at Beluaterra.
>
> It looks like there is not enough support amongst rulers of BT to force
> Luz De Bia to move their capital back and the position of LdB on
> geographically is making efforts to force it without atleast Enweil support
> is pretty much impossible.
>
> So, atm it looks like it is possible to take a risk and abuse capital
> change if you have enough support amongst rulers on that continent and you
> are willing to take LB and hope that it is just wounding one and not killing
> one. Arguments which are defending LdB are based on mainly to the fact that
> strategic capital movements has been happened so many times before without
> punishment and that it is not written rule, so LB was good enough
> punishment. Also there was some mentions that Tom has not officially and
> clearly stated that LdB should move their capital back. Oh, and side note, i
> havent seen single message from Nhoc(ruler of LdB) after this discussion was
> brought to ruler channel.
>
> I understand that there is very diffrent cultures and peoples involved on
> this game, but howcome we can understand Tom's email that much diffrent?
>
> I got impression that Tom wants capital abuse to stop and that we(rulers
> of BT) will make it happen, but some seem to understand that mail totally
> diffrent or they are just ignoring it.
>
> This particular issue has very little meaning to "my" realm(Thalmarkin)
> directly and i even dont see reason to have this rule, but if there is that
> kind of rule, i expect players to honor those rules.
>
> So, could it be possible to get "official" statement from Tom, mayby
> posted on ruler channel at BT(i have feeling that some of the rulers aint
> following mailing list) what he wants us to do, atm. i would love to end
> discussion about it, but same time i feel quilty to let things like these
> just pass through... ofcourse unless i'm wrong about it. Then i will humbly
> apologize.
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061011/c1999039/attachment.htm


More information about the Discuss mailing list