[Discuss] Re: Royal Status

[bpratt]

On 10/4/06, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > So how come is it that there are wars with nobles on both sides?
> > Disagreements? Duels?  Executions? Outlaws? Obviously, its OK for a
> noble to
> > think another noble may be wrong about something. At least it is in
> > Battlemaster.
>
> Someone else can say you're wrong, but you'd never admit it - that's
> why it's preferable to duel to the death. If you're not so keen on
> death, you can try and blame someone else for misinforming you, I
> suppose.


One might argue that it is a point of nobility to compromise, to be able to
admit when one is wrong. I mean there's nothing in the Chivalric Code that
states, "And remember, you're always right about everything."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061004/cab4d9ca/attachment-0001.htm