[Discuss] Re: Royal Status
w drix
valdrix1975 at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 3 20:05:11 CEST 2006
bpratt <saintmaggot at gmail.com> wrote: I guess my only problem conceptually is how for example, a Prime Minister elected every 30 days is considered Royal Blood... anyone knows that his blood is exactly the same as it was before being chosen as head of government. And it's not like in real life, where Royals actually were born into a family, a line of descendants of Kings and Queens and all that.
Part of this is me wanting to integrate the feudal concept of family and inherited titles with BM, which I know is pretty farfetched given game balance limitations.
Well, nobility are the people who hold lands, wealth, title, and many have a claim to a crown....even if 4,000 people would need to die or refuse the crown in order for them to get it.
We are all nobility in the game, so any one of us could become the ruler. Once ruler, then it is very understandable that he/she is royal. If another is elected, it does not change that the first one is royal...and by our own elections no less.
For us to say they are not royal, would meen we were wrong, as nobility that just isent acceptable is it?
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061003/1cb2f9d1/attachment.htm
More information about the Discuss
mailing list