Royal Dukes (was [Discuss] Royal Status)
Alex Davies
the1exile at hotmail.co.uk
Mon Oct 2 17:41:09 CEST 2006
>From: "Loren Schmidt" <loren.schmidt at gmail.com>
>
>I guess you wouldn't believe in goading him into running in the first place
>with a false sense of support,
After he's been protested out by the nobles, and had the intelligence to
realise how to secede and how to live with it as well, I seriously doubt he
will believe anyone who then says "oh yeah, actually he did a rubbish job
before so we protested him out, but now lets elect him"...
>and then stabbing him in the back.
Oh, by all means, stab him, that's what infils are for. But that doesn't
work.
>I mean
>when you look at it, that's what happened to Caesar. He was effectively
>immune, then they elected him and stabbed him in the back. As you can see
>I
>contend we don't, and you're too pessimistic. It's quite realistic that
>someone considered a royal can't publically be taken out.
>
Infils are hardly "public" and neither is stabbing someone in their sleep.
And Caesar is a different time period, with a different hierarchy to
medieval europe.
The1exile (AKA Sniperchief)
I had a mentor, "See the spoon, see the spoon" he used to say, but all I saw
was fish.
_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters!
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters
More information about the Discuss
mailing list