News

Royal Dukes (was [Discuss] Royal Status)

Alex Davies the1exile at hotmail.co.uk
Mon Oct 2 17:41:09 CEST 2006


>From: "Loren Schmidt" <loren.schmidt at gmail.com>
>
>I guess you wouldn't believe in goading him into running in the first place
>with a false sense of support,

After he's been protested out by the nobles, and had the intelligence to 
realise how to secede and how to live with it as well, I seriously doubt he 
will believe anyone who then says "oh yeah, actually he did a rubbish job 
before so we protested him out, but now lets elect him"...

>and then stabbing him in the back.

Oh, by all means, stab him, that's what infils are for. But that doesn't 
work.

>I mean
>when you look at it, that's what happened to Caesar.  He was effectively
>immune, then they elected him and stabbed him in the back.  As you can see 
>I
>contend we don't, and you're too pessimistic.  It's quite realistic that
>someone considered a royal can't publically be taken out.
>

Infils are hardly "public" and neither is stabbing someone in their sleep. 
And Caesar is a different time period, with a different hierarchy to 
medieval europe.

The1exile (AKA Sniperchief)

I had a mentor, "See the spoon, see the spoon" he used to say, but all I saw 
was fish.

_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters



More information about the Discuss mailing list