[Discuss] Royal Status

[Paris]

2006/2/5, Tom Vogt <tom at lemuria.org>:

> It's a game mechanic - you step down, you lose royal status. One thing
> that I might consider changing is setting some term length, i.e. if you
> step down after having ruled for at least 3 months, then you stay a
> royal. That would sound reasonable to me.
>
> (Reference: [Discuss] Royal Status)


and



> Wiki: There are two ways to lose royal status: 1) leave the realm (or
> island) 2) step down. Stepping down means you actively decided to give up
> your royal status. It is also necessary to prevent groups of friends from
> exploiting the system and making all their characters royal so you can't ban
> this "clan".

(Reference: http://wiki.battlemaster.org/index.php/Royalty )



In Avamar Selective, the former ruler with character name One was forced to
*step down* from the position of Pontifex due to protests. Is this case any
difference?

This character is still considered a royal and if it is a bug, you should
better fix it soon because we have difficulty in kicking him out of the
Realm and his IC intentions are supposed to destroy the Realm. Since we can
not ban him, it would be pitty an entire Realm to be destroyed because of
a bug.

...knock knock... Tom are you there? :/

*(Please, do not start telling again that there are other ways to get rid of
him. Yes, there may be, but this is not the point here. If he should not be
royal and he wasn't, this thread would have not been started. Thank you.)*
**
-- 
Lucifer Jr. - Kalmar Islands
Esperos - Avamar Selective
Laura - Nighthelm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061001/d108333a/attachment.htm