[Discuss] (un)fair play

[Ourania Papasozomenou]

It's not just a matter of co-ordinating the army, you know. You are right when you say that the army can be co-ordinated and thus eliminate the disadvatage of no Marshal, but you are forgetting that not everyone logs in too often, and not everyne follows the settings (for some reason I could never understand:p)

>From where I stand, I feel a bit left behind, because there are new features added to the Marshal, new settings for them to use, and yet my character can't see it. It's like the game moves forward, but I'm left behind. 
And it's a cool thing to add. But it's not very nice that some people can't use that because of a bug. 

Now, I don't know if the players who play Marshals intended to use the Marshal settings at the beginning. (they said no, so i believe them). But the General, an experienced player still uses them, even though an OOC agreement was reached, saying that for the sake of fair-play, no Marshals would be used. 

I wouldn't go so far to call the player of the General an abuser, or cheater or whatever. 

But I would ask the people who are working on bugs to have a look at the Marshal bug. It's a pitty that some players can't enjoy new features.

 
---------------------------------
Sponsored Link

Rates near 39yr lows. $420,000 Loan for $1399/mo - Calculate new house payment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061121/578d2946/attachment.htm