[Discuss] RE: Discuss Digest, Vol 18, Issue 12

[Björn Falkenström]

"Ok what is the lord, Duke, Knight ect?  Why do they not figure in?  A Duke
is really one step below a Ruler.  They control whole countrysides."

Indeed. They can keep track too, but only the council can see if they really
logged in or not.

"No you said it correct before.  The position is Arch Priest.  Judge is
Demo.  A little Rep and in a minor way Tyranny (we should all know the
tyrant is the real judge in a tyranny).  Religating a Arch Priest to be a
judge... that is very demeaning."

An interesting way of looking at it. I like it, but in bm, the Arch Priest
is the judge. The only one who can banish someone, and if one wants a realm
where people follow orders well, then banishing those who do not follow
orders is necessary from an IC perspective.

"You have 3 duchies and however many lords.  That is more than enough.  And
it is only a problem if you are being a cop."

They do help, but they cant see if people logged on or have been inactive
for 7 days.

" No."

Why not? A tyrrant at the very least would surely banish someone if they
ignored him.


>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060505/3b96aca3/attachment.htm