[Discuss] Theoretical realistic messaging
Vinnie
vinnietje at gmail.com
Tue May 2 21:20:33 CEST 2006
2006/5/2, Daniel Richard <lordperrina at gmail.com>:
>
> i'm against this idea myself. I see no use of messages getting delayed
> and for what reason. rulers don't always talk to other rulers and same goes
> for every position.
>
> you'd be forcing me to have to continiously log in to make sure I recieved
> any important orders.
>
> I actually agree with vinnie though and his statements.
>
>
>
> Personally, I think this is a stupid idea, really stupid idea. I don't
> play battlemaster to wait 6 hours later for messages to arrive. I like to
> log in, read, respond, log off, next turn repeat process.
>
> Forcing me to play more is going to annoy the hell out of me.
>
> Light Weight people have seemingly forgot what those words mean and
> rather turn this into a log in every hour on the hour to make sure things
> are okay.
>
It seems like a lot of people agree with you. There's even a petition about
it on the Wiki:
http://wiki.battlemaster.org/index.php/Instantaneous_Message_Petition
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060502/1753926b/attachment.htm
More information about the Discuss
mailing list