[Discuss] 2 family members in government positions

[Vinnie]

>
>
> I think the argument is a little mixed up though - I don't think the
> one councilor per island thing is to stop conflicts of interest, it's
> to give more players a chance (which many people have already
> mentioned), so the rule shouldn't be removed simply because the
> conflict of interest thing isn't valid, when the actual reason for it
> is still completely true. (You can say it would be better to share
> things out IC, rather than impose it OOC, but that's a different
> arguement)
>
>
It's not for warring realms, I agree. But if it was for giving more players
a chance, why isn't it for each account, instead of for each ISLAND? That
doesn't make sense. You can still have 3 characters have a position if
they're on a different island.

If it was only to give more players a chance, you could make a
council-position-limit per account.


I thought it was to prevent someone having a position in one realm and in
its ally, creating some sort of OOC alliance. Or even if not OOC islands, it
might lead to one huge alliance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060602/68f013bd/attachment.htm