News

[Discuss] Inactivity: "you should have told us" does not apply

Björn Falkenström falkenstrom at gmail.com
Mon Jul 24 21:49:37 CEST 2006


"Sorry about that.  I did not mean to make it look like an accusation.  I
know Björn used to be extremely careful about not banning inactive players,
but then it became impossible to know."

That is correct. I used to be very careful. Now, how can I ban for
inactivity even if I wanted when I don´t know if they are active or
inactive?  The character went in the complete opposite direction (and far
also) than what the orders stated. The character did something wrong and
paid for it. Thus in character, everyone is struggling for Perdan in a 4 vs
1 realm war while the character that was banned was off having dinner with
her family.

I still think it has only gotten worse since the "last logon" was removed.
But I do of course know the point of removing it. I just wish we could find
another way of accomplishing it because I don´t think this is doing it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://news.battlemaster.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060724/c4af8a8c/attachment.htm


More information about the Discuss mailing list